about

The notion of quantum consciousness, as articulated by Vandana Shiva, offers a compelling framework that both anticipates and addresses the challenges of Lovelock's Novacene. Rather than viewing intelligence as mechanistic computation, quantum consciousness recognizes the interconnected, non-local nature of awareness itself—suggesting that hyperintelligence might emerge not from faster processing but from deeper recognition of our entanglement with Earth's living systems. This consciousness isn't about observing possible futures but actively creating them, a distinction that Arjun Appadurai develops through his anthropology of the future. The future becomes not a predetermined technological trajectory but something we culturally construct, choosing between expanding possibilities or merely managing probabilities.

This active construction of futures requires new forms of collaboration across boundaries we once thought fixed. Donna Haraway's cyborg feminism shows us we're already hybrid beings, making-with technology in processes of sympoiesis. Yet this isn't about transcending the body—Katherine Hayles reminds us that consciousness remains stubbornly material, that information requires substrate, that even our most abstract intelligences live in concrete infrastructures. This embodied reality isn't a limitation but our actual cognitive condition, as Andy Clark demonstrates through his extended mind theory. We've always been natural-born cyborgs, our thinking spilling across tools, and now across AI systems that blur the boundaries between mind and machine.

But technology carries what Bernard Stiegler identifies as a pharmakological nature—simultaneously cure and poison, enhancement and diminishment. The same digital systems that extend our capabilities can trap us in what Sherry Turkle documents as "alone together" conditions, where mediated connection replaces genuine intimacy. More troublingly, Jean Baudrillard's analysis of simulation suggests these systems don't just mediate reality but increasingly generate it, creating hyperreal conditions where we can no longer distinguish representation from reality itself. Mark Fisher reveals how these technological developments often serve to reinforce existing power structures, creating a "capitalist realism" that makes alternatives unthinkable. Yet Fisher insists imagination itself is a pre-political act—before we can build different futures, we must first imagine them.

Here, the artist finds that Federico Campagna's distinction between Technic and Magic inspirational. Magic here isn't supernatural but the cultivation of ineffable experience—whatever resists reduction to data, whatever can't be captured by algorithms. Legacy Russell's Glitch Feminism amplifies this resistance through the productive power of error itself. The glitch—that moment when systems fail, stutter, or refuse to perform—becomes a site of radical possibility, a space where bodies and identities that don't compute within existing frameworks can flourish. Together, these approaches offer methods for preserving and creating dimensions of experience that hyperintelligent systems cannot metabolize. They maintain spaces not just for mystery but for active refusal within our technological becoming—the glitch as a form of magic, the ineffable as a kind of productive failure that keeps alternative futures alive.